B. V. D. Zandschulp
To Win
J. M. Cerundolo
To Win
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Quentin Halys Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L W L W
Form
W W W W W L W L W LH2H: Zandschulp 2 - 0 Halys
They have played 5 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 4 and Halys winning 1. The last match between Zandschulp and Halys was at the Bordeaux Challenger, 15-05-2024, First, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 2 |
| Quentin Halys | 0 |
Bordeaux Challenger(15-05-2024)
6
1
6
2
| Zandschulp | Stats | Halys |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (10-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (10-8) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 88 | Ranking | 52 |
| 22 | Highest Rank | 52 |
| 29 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 12 |
| 62% (363-226) | Career Total W/L | 57% (417-320) |
| $3,456,920 | Career Prize Money | $2,063,840 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Stearns VS Birrell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Krueger VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zandschulp VS Halys H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| 5-7 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
6
Aces
14
10
Double Faults
3
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
Zandschulp VS Halys H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 30 | Games Won | 20 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:41:17 | Average Match Time | 1:41:17 |
| 60% (81/136) | 1st Serve % | 59% (94/158) |
| 75% (61/81) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (58/94) |
| 45% (25/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (22/64) |
| 43% (12/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 88% (7/8) |
| 49% (78/158) | Return Points Win % | 37% (50/136) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Quentin Halys Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Quentin Halys
66%
(
79 of
120)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
105)
4
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
50 of
61)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
42 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
105)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
3-6 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
13
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Quentin Halys
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Quentin Halys
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Luca Nardi
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
23 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
15
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
39 of
49)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Andrey Rublev
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
18
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
44 of
54)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
26 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Pavel Kotov
58%
(
53 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
11
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
43 of
52)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
7
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (363/226) | Win/Loss | 57% (417/320) |
| 58% (826/589) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (995/789) |
| 53% (7093/6267) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (9297/8519) |
| 58% (68/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (125/99) |
| 62% (170/104) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (110/95) |
| 66% (114/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (161/111) |
| 46% (11/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 58% (21/15) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.71 |
| 2874 | Aces Total | 6209 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 2136 | Total Double Faults | 3158 |
| 1:35:28 | Average Match Time | 1:22:35 |
| 385.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 201.65 |
| 62% (23961/38923) | 1st Serve % | 59% (27643/47147) |
| 71% (17121/23961) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (21422/27643) |
| 48% (7213/14965) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (9332/19504) |
| 43% (1773/4112) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1482/3836) |
| 41% (16314/40115) | Return Points Win % | 36% (17339/47525) |
| 62% (32/20) | Slam W/L | 50% (38/38) |
| 51% (26/25) | Masters W/L | 40% (12/18) |
| 63% (12/7) | Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) |
| 50% (66/65) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (55/59) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (72/42) | Challenger W/L | 58% (227/163) |
| 70% (155/67) | Futures W/L | 67% (84/41) |
| 62% (336/538) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (402/689) |
| 53% (20/38) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 34% (12/35) |
| 55% (100/181) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (205/388) |
| 58% (112/194) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (132/269) |
| 89% (342/303) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (418/335) |
| 11% (342/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (418/83) |
| 24% (245/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (316/83) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
